Okay, so everybody's heard the possible spoiler about Batman 3's prologue. Well, that person is right. So what happens is Batman is fleeing from the police, injured, and is also being traced by the SWAT who have detained the Joker, but Bats escapes. Or does he? Near his escape exit he crash into two trucks, even more injured and is approached by Bane and his henchmen. Bane challenges the overinjured Batboy and breaks his back.
Why is this (or most of it) probably right?
Watch the teaser trailer again:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Sktgm0aD8
Pause it at 1:28 and tell me, as the lumbering Bane approaches Batboy, who is that man with a gun in the corner? Then pause it again at 1:04, whats Bruce doing? Rehabiliting.
Now this is my guess to the story, the above happens and Bruce cant take it as being Batman anymore. He knows Bane is out there and Bane is controlling Gotham City in a bit of a Cold War and he controls it because he controls the city officials and he bribes police through threats out of the way and they cant do anything, why you may ask, because all lawyers, all bad cops, all judges and attorney's are part of the League of Shadows.
After Ra's al Ghul chose Batman to succeed him, Bane was pushed back, and when Batman, lets say, "administered" Ra's death in the train, Bane became the boss and decides to take vengeance and make sure he stays the boss by breaking Batman, not necessarily kill him. He destroys the Batman not just physically, but also mentally by showing him how Gotham falls apart without the Batman.
Now Josie Gordie Levitt decides to fight back in a sort of Cold War and attacks Bane, beginning to cripple the Perfect Organization. Bruce in the meanwhile begins to rehabilitate and administers all control over Gotham to Miranda Tate who could be Talia or the less known Nyssa al Ghul. Bruce hears of John Blake (Levitt) and reveals his identity to him, he trains Levitt to replace him.
Bruce, later, fully rehabilitated goes after Bane and to this point I'm out of ideas.
What I'm guessing is something involving Jean Paul-Valley Batman happens, but this would make an already puzzling film too long. Though I'm sure that John Blake is chosen to replace Batman.
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Wednesday, November 2, 2011
What Defines a Tyrant?
Lets look at those who have been called tyrants: Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Hussein.
Which of those four were really tyrants: Stalin & Hussein. Don't get me wrong, Hitler was a bad man. The worst man to have lived in fact, nobody in the world was worse than Hitler. Hitler was so bad that in Futurama, even the people in the future cared about his atrocities, things like that don't go away.
Tyrant definition: a sovereign or other ruler who uses power oppressively or unjustly.
Yes, Hitler was unjust, but not against his own people. No, let me rephrase that, Hitler was the most unjust motherfucker to have ever lived, and was not oppressive against the Aryans. His Aryan and Nazi class cared for him and I cant say he did back, but I can say that he gave them respect and good lives while he murdered everybody else (kind of showing who's special)
Now I don't need to explain why Stalin was a tyrant, but I'll do it. Murdered the most people in WW2, over 60 Million, during the war period millions of Soviets died from starvation.
Why was Hussein a tyrant, look at the Iraq War and Iraq Lobster. Phase one, paranoia - try to invade Iran because your scared that he's going to get your people to rebel. Phase two, distrust - murder your own people [Kurds]. Phase three, anger - invade your nations biggest ally because they cant afford to pay you. Phase four - the fall, get your ass kicked by bigger assholes.
Now Lenin, Lenin was different than Stalin. Made a tyrant in the 1960s image fade 70's 80's, made a dictator in the 90's. Now, he was made a tyrant by the US discrediting the Soviet Union. They say that he and Stalin were no different, killing their own people, but Stalin did not know where to stop, thus making Stalin a tyrant, Lenin knew where to stop. Lenin did kill people, he was vicious and mean, but he knew where to stop. If it were not for Lenin, we would not have things on the Moon, or orbit the Earth or a Mars Rover or Iraq Lobster. Lenin was a revolutionary, Stalin was a murderer, Hitler was a nationalist and Hussein was paranoid.
Three are the qualities of a Tyrant; two were tyrants; one was the worst of all four; and one was unjustly made the worst, they never thanked him for starting the Space Race... did they?
Which of those four were really tyrants: Stalin & Hussein. Don't get me wrong, Hitler was a bad man. The worst man to have lived in fact, nobody in the world was worse than Hitler. Hitler was so bad that in Futurama, even the people in the future cared about his atrocities, things like that don't go away.
Tyrant definition: a sovereign or other ruler who uses power oppressively or unjustly.
Yes, Hitler was unjust, but not against his own people. No, let me rephrase that, Hitler was the most unjust motherfucker to have ever lived, and was not oppressive against the Aryans. His Aryan and Nazi class cared for him and I cant say he did back, but I can say that he gave them respect and good lives while he murdered everybody else (kind of showing who's special)
Now I don't need to explain why Stalin was a tyrant, but I'll do it. Murdered the most people in WW2, over 60 Million, during the war period millions of Soviets died from starvation.
Why was Hussein a tyrant, look at the Iraq War and Iraq Lobster. Phase one, paranoia - try to invade Iran because your scared that he's going to get your people to rebel. Phase two, distrust - murder your own people [Kurds]. Phase three, anger - invade your nations biggest ally because they cant afford to pay you. Phase four - the fall, get your ass kicked by bigger assholes.
Now Lenin, Lenin was different than Stalin. Made a tyrant in the 1960s image fade 70's 80's, made a dictator in the 90's. Now, he was made a tyrant by the US discrediting the Soviet Union. They say that he and Stalin were no different, killing their own people, but Stalin did not know where to stop, thus making Stalin a tyrant, Lenin knew where to stop. Lenin did kill people, he was vicious and mean, but he knew where to stop. If it were not for Lenin, we would not have things on the Moon, or orbit the Earth or a Mars Rover or Iraq Lobster. Lenin was a revolutionary, Stalin was a murderer, Hitler was a nationalist and Hussein was paranoid.
Three are the qualities of a Tyrant; two were tyrants; one was the worst of all four; and one was unjustly made the worst, they never thanked him for starting the Space Race... did they?
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Finally
Finally the Libyan Civil War is at its Endgame. Yeah, it took six months, why did the fucking Iraq War take 8 years? Why is the fucking Afghan Civil War have been gone on for how long now? Oh yeah, that's right: 33 Years! Yet this war ends in six months.
Congratualtions: Gaddafi - UGLIEST FUCKER IN THE WORLD.
Guess what, Gaddafi married his daughter about 33, to his first-cousin (her uncle).
Ya, what a sick perverted mothafucka.
Congratualtions: Gaddafi - UGLIEST FUCKER IN THE WORLD.
Guess what, Gaddafi married his daughter about 33, to his first-cousin (her uncle).
Ya, what a sick perverted mothafucka.
Friday, September 30, 2011
Creeping A Missile
The Most Bloody Uprising in History: 2011 Syrian Uprising
The Most Dangerous War of 2011: 2011 Libyan Civil War
The Most Dangerous Situation of 2011 (aka: More Dangerous than the Last Two): the 2011 Egyptian Revolution and Post-Mubarak Transition
Today Anwar al-Awlaki died. A fact that al-Qaeda is breaking down. Anwar was a United States citizen born in New Mexico, he helped plan the 911 bombings. He has killed a lot of people. A lot of the people he killed were not killed by him, but by people trying to kill him. He was the most dangerous man on the Earth. Anwar al-Awlaki was considered one of al-Qaeda’s top recruiters and had been highly sought after by both American and Yemeni officials for years. Al-Awlaki was also internet-savvy, using his fluent English and Web presence to draw recruits. Experts say this is a future model for terror recruitment. Despite his pedigree as a internet-savvy spiritual leader, al-Awlaki was also a U.S. citizen, meaning some see civil rights issues in this situation
Anwar was worse than Osama Bin Laden, the man that officially planned 911. Anwar was the worst man alive in the 21st Century, no mistake about that.
But you cant always get it right two times can you?
Today, America tried to kill another Al-Qaeda member, or was it Taliban? or something completely different? Nevertheless that bomb did not hit their target, but it hit Pakistani citizens. The people in India are parding. The people in Paksitan are protesting. Those protests want America out, America destroyed Iraq and allowed the Taliban in because they thought Saddam was making nukes, it was a war of no reason. They attacked Paksitan due to its close proximity with Afghanistan and the fact that some Taliban hid there. They attacked Pakistan because it was at a Civil War started by the Soviet Union and Osama went there after bombing America.
Consider this the Arab Spring of the U.S Military Conflicts.
Due to the Tunisian Revolution, the Egyptian Protestors started what would become the most dangerous situation, 1000 people dead, 6000 critically injured. Sure the death rate is not as high as Syria or Libya, but if you go there, you will get hurt and you will get hurt bad. I bet you the death count and the injured count is being under counted. The Egyptian Revolution started protests all amongst the Arab Spring. Now it could lead Egypt to war with Israel.
Egypt's Bloody Revolution led to a short one in Yemen that I believe is ongoing. The death of Anwar is supposed to curtail this revolution Yemeni Loyalists probably hope that their leader will stay. Al-Qaeda will probably crack. The Yemeni Loyalists will fail. And America's fatal mistake on trying to get it right could start a U.S Military Revolution that starts when Pakistan demands the U.S to leave it alone. Will the U.S soldiers quickly leave Paksitan, take out all deployed soldiers in Iraq and quickly end its Afghan mission?
The Most Dangerous War of 2011: 2011 Libyan Civil War
The Most Dangerous Situation of 2011 (aka: More Dangerous than the Last Two): the 2011 Egyptian Revolution and Post-Mubarak Transition
Today Anwar al-Awlaki died. A fact that al-Qaeda is breaking down. Anwar was a United States citizen born in New Mexico, he helped plan the 911 bombings. He has killed a lot of people. A lot of the people he killed were not killed by him, but by people trying to kill him. He was the most dangerous man on the Earth. Anwar al-Awlaki was considered one of al-Qaeda’s top recruiters and had been highly sought after by both American and Yemeni officials for years. Al-Awlaki was also internet-savvy, using his fluent English and Web presence to draw recruits. Experts say this is a future model for terror recruitment. Despite his pedigree as a internet-savvy spiritual leader, al-Awlaki was also a U.S. citizen, meaning some see civil rights issues in this situation
Anwar was worse than Osama Bin Laden, the man that officially planned 911. Anwar was the worst man alive in the 21st Century, no mistake about that.
But you cant always get it right two times can you?
Today, America tried to kill another Al-Qaeda member, or was it Taliban? or something completely different? Nevertheless that bomb did not hit their target, but it hit Pakistani citizens. The people in India are parding. The people in Paksitan are protesting. Those protests want America out, America destroyed Iraq and allowed the Taliban in because they thought Saddam was making nukes, it was a war of no reason. They attacked Paksitan due to its close proximity with Afghanistan and the fact that some Taliban hid there. They attacked Pakistan because it was at a Civil War started by the Soviet Union and Osama went there after bombing America.
Consider this the Arab Spring of the U.S Military Conflicts.
Due to the Tunisian Revolution, the Egyptian Protestors started what would become the most dangerous situation, 1000 people dead, 6000 critically injured. Sure the death rate is not as high as Syria or Libya, but if you go there, you will get hurt and you will get hurt bad. I bet you the death count and the injured count is being under counted. The Egyptian Revolution started protests all amongst the Arab Spring. Now it could lead Egypt to war with Israel.
Egypt's Bloody Revolution led to a short one in Yemen that I believe is ongoing. The death of Anwar is supposed to curtail this revolution Yemeni Loyalists probably hope that their leader will stay. Al-Qaeda will probably crack. The Yemeni Loyalists will fail. And America's fatal mistake on trying to get it right could start a U.S Military Revolution that starts when Pakistan demands the U.S to leave it alone. Will the U.S soldiers quickly leave Paksitan, take out all deployed soldiers in Iraq and quickly end its Afghan mission?
Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Long Vita Sony
Please Note that this is an Update of a previous post titled the Playstation Vita, this, however, adds three extra paragraphs.
It started with the launch of the Playstation Portable as a competitor to to the Nintendo DS. When one company came out with a new model for their handheld system, the other did as well. So this put Sony and Nintendo as the primary competitors for the handheld market, always releasing new stuff to compete with each other in every way.
This was until the Nintendo DSiXL was released; Sony did not release any handheld back, at this time people assumed it to be because of the PSPgo's failure. Sony did not even discuss something like the PSP has a long or short life ahead of it. Nintendo had already announced the 3DS.
It was after the Nintendo 3DS' launch that people began to speculate a PSP2, for about two month's these rumors were halted due to the many presumed official revelations of the Sony Experia Play, the Playstation Phone. Then the big announcement came, the NGP.
As the 3DS lagged in both sales and good quality games, with the most anticipated (yes, Assassin's Creed: Lost Legacy is not going to come out) being canceled, Sony showcased the NGP, showing its power to the max, without giving any specifics.
At E3, Sony unveiled the NGP's spec's and details, everything about the NGP was revealed from price to hardware. The NGP became known as the Playstation Vita and from its time known as the NGP, it already had a blockbuster lineup in its hand, Call of Duty, Killzone, Uncharted and yes, Badman.
Also at E3, the Wii U was announced, and upon announcement, Nintendo lost a lot of shares. The Playstation Vita was then shown to replicate what the Wii U could do and on a modern generation console, no need to switch to the future. It can do what the Wii U controller can do, but more, such as a back touchpad and co-op.
To show their advantage over the Nintendo 3DS and the Wii U, the Playstation Vita and the Playstation 3 showed off something they else they could do that Nintendo's products couldn't do: get good games and work together.
Nintendo then announced a new peripheral for the 3DS, a second slide pad to compete with the Playstation Vita's two joysticks. With the radical price drop of the 3DS, this second slide pad would increase the price by little, however, the question was then brought up, which games from the lagging selection.
With Nintendo barely releasing any original titles, with the only originals having been remakes and a Mario game; third-person parties too are making many games, compared to how much Nintendo is making. Nintendo's titles have been very good, a third-persons party sucks, ass.
The second slide-pad was created to give developers more room, but the titles released pre to the announcement will likely be stranded now, a new strategy for Nintendo to compete with the Vita, however, in doing this, it seems that all support for games without a second slide-pad will be knocked away. Due to the awkwardness of the slidepad's location, and the fitting location of the Vita's second joystick, Nintendo could discontinue the second slidepad before the release of the Vita.
It started with the launch of the Playstation Portable as a competitor to to the Nintendo DS. When one company came out with a new model for their handheld system, the other did as well. So this put Sony and Nintendo as the primary competitors for the handheld market, always releasing new stuff to compete with each other in every way.
This was until the Nintendo DSiXL was released; Sony did not release any handheld back, at this time people assumed it to be because of the PSPgo's failure. Sony did not even discuss something like the PSP has a long or short life ahead of it. Nintendo had already announced the 3DS.
It was after the Nintendo 3DS' launch that people began to speculate a PSP2, for about two month's these rumors were halted due to the many presumed official revelations of the Sony Experia Play, the Playstation Phone. Then the big announcement came, the NGP.
As the 3DS lagged in both sales and good quality games, with the most anticipated (yes, Assassin's Creed: Lost Legacy is not going to come out) being canceled, Sony showcased the NGP, showing its power to the max, without giving any specifics.
At E3, Sony unveiled the NGP's spec's and details, everything about the NGP was revealed from price to hardware. The NGP became known as the Playstation Vita and from its time known as the NGP, it already had a blockbuster lineup in its hand, Call of Duty, Killzone, Uncharted and yes, Badman.
Also at E3, the Wii U was announced, and upon announcement, Nintendo lost a lot of shares. The Playstation Vita was then shown to replicate what the Wii U could do and on a modern generation console, no need to switch to the future. It can do what the Wii U controller can do, but more, such as a back touchpad and co-op.
To show their advantage over the Nintendo 3DS and the Wii U, the Playstation Vita and the Playstation 3 showed off something they else they could do that Nintendo's products couldn't do: get good games and work together.
Nintendo then announced a new peripheral for the 3DS, a second slide pad to compete with the Playstation Vita's two joysticks. With the radical price drop of the 3DS, this second slide pad would increase the price by little, however, the question was then brought up, which games from the lagging selection.
With Nintendo barely releasing any original titles, with the only originals having been remakes and a Mario game; third-person parties too are making many games, compared to how much Nintendo is making. Nintendo's titles have been very good, a third-persons party sucks, ass.
The second slide-pad was created to give developers more room, but the titles released pre to the announcement will likely be stranded now, a new strategy for Nintendo to compete with the Vita, however, in doing this, it seems that all support for games without a second slide-pad will be knocked away. Due to the awkwardness of the slidepad's location, and the fitting location of the Vita's second joystick, Nintendo could discontinue the second slidepad before the release of the Vita.
Wednesday, August 31, 2011
Can Warner Bros amount to EA
If One True Media didn't just become a bitch then Crash Bandicoot: The Sins of the Father Part 8 would have been up already.
Her'es the thing, EA's stronghold in in TPS game's came from Lord of the Rings video games, they don't have the license anymore, but they have BioWare, you get one, you lose one.
Now Warner Bros has the license, the first thing they released was Lord of the Rings: Aragorn's Quest. It was an average start, a good game, but an average start. EA had a tremendous start and an awesome game. Warner Bros is likely going to be more or less consistent with their license, having given it to Snowblind Studios. It looks as if they are trying to beat EA's Lord of the Rings video game fame with Lord of the Rings: War in the North. If this succeeds, you can expect Snowblind to make a Hobbit video game using the Dark Alliance Engine while working on a sequel to War in the North.
This is how it'll work out if War in the North is successful. Snowblind will be commissioned to making the Hobbit video game, parts 1 and 2, which they'll work on while working on a sequel to War in the North likely. The Hobbit will receive positive reviews, but it wont be as good as War in the North because of the developers desire to work full time on War in the North 2 and because they'll have less freedom when making the game.
Will Warner Bro's Lord of the Rings best EA's? Look at the games:
EA:
The Two Towers : 8.3/10
The Return of the King : 8.9/10
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle Earth : 8.4/10
The Lord of the Rings: The Third Age : 8.5/10
The Lord of the Rings: Tactics : 7.7/10
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle Earth II : 9.0/10
Warner Bros
The Lord of the Rings: Aragorn's Quest : 6/10
You choose.
Her'es the thing, EA's stronghold in in TPS game's came from Lord of the Rings video games, they don't have the license anymore, but they have BioWare, you get one, you lose one.
Now Warner Bros has the license, the first thing they released was Lord of the Rings: Aragorn's Quest. It was an average start, a good game, but an average start. EA had a tremendous start and an awesome game. Warner Bros is likely going to be more or less consistent with their license, having given it to Snowblind Studios. It looks as if they are trying to beat EA's Lord of the Rings video game fame with Lord of the Rings: War in the North. If this succeeds, you can expect Snowblind to make a Hobbit video game using the Dark Alliance Engine while working on a sequel to War in the North.
This is how it'll work out if War in the North is successful. Snowblind will be commissioned to making the Hobbit video game, parts 1 and 2, which they'll work on while working on a sequel to War in the North likely. The Hobbit will receive positive reviews, but it wont be as good as War in the North because of the developers desire to work full time on War in the North 2 and because they'll have less freedom when making the game.
Will Warner Bro's Lord of the Rings best EA's? Look at the games:
EA:
The Two Towers : 8.3/10
The Return of the King : 8.9/10
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle Earth : 8.4/10
The Lord of the Rings: The Third Age : 8.5/10
The Lord of the Rings: Tactics : 7.7/10
The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle Earth II : 9.0/10
Warner Bros
The Lord of the Rings: Aragorn's Quest : 6/10
You choose.
Sunday, August 14, 2011
The Playstation Vita
It started with the launch of the Playstation Portable as a competitor to to the Nintendo DS. When one company came out with a new model for their handheld system, the other did as well. So this put Sony and Nintendo as the primary competitors for the handheld market, always releasing new stuff to compete with each other in every way.
This was until the Nintendo DSiXL was released; Sony did not release any handheld back, at this time people assumed it to be because of the PSPgo's failure. Sony did not even discuss something like the PSP has a long or short life ahead of it. Nintendo had already announced the 3DS.
It was after the Nintendo 3DS' launch that people began to speculate a PSP2, for about two month's these rumors were halted due to the many presumed official revelations of the Sony Experia Play, the Playstation Phone. Then the big announcement came, the NGP.
As the 3DS lagged in both sales and good quality games, with the most anticipated (yes, Assassin's Creed: Lost Legacy is not going to come out) being canceled, Sony showcased the NGP, showing its power to the max, without giving any specifics.
At E3, Sony unveiled the NGP's spec's and details, everything about the NGP was revealed from price to hardware. The NGP became known as the Playstation Vita and from its time known as the NGP, it already had a blockbuster lineup in its hand, Call of Duty, Killzone, Uncharted and yes, Badman.
Also at E3, the Wii U was announced, and upon announcement, Nintendo lost a lot of shares. The Playstation Vita was then shown to replicate what the Wii U could do and on a modern generation console, no need to switch to the future. It can do what the Wii U controller can do, but more, such as a back touchpad and co-op.
To show their advantage over the Nintendo 3DS and the Wii U, the Playstation Vita and the Playstation 3 showed off something they else they could do that Nintendo's products couldn't do: get good games and work together.
The 3DS' sales then bombed, Nintendo cut its price by $ 100. Nintendo then lost a lot of money and shares.
That my friends is the story of the Playstation Vita.
This was until the Nintendo DSiXL was released; Sony did not release any handheld back, at this time people assumed it to be because of the PSPgo's failure. Sony did not even discuss something like the PSP has a long or short life ahead of it. Nintendo had already announced the 3DS.
It was after the Nintendo 3DS' launch that people began to speculate a PSP2, for about two month's these rumors were halted due to the many presumed official revelations of the Sony Experia Play, the Playstation Phone. Then the big announcement came, the NGP.
As the 3DS lagged in both sales and good quality games, with the most anticipated (yes, Assassin's Creed: Lost Legacy is not going to come out) being canceled, Sony showcased the NGP, showing its power to the max, without giving any specifics.
At E3, Sony unveiled the NGP's spec's and details, everything about the NGP was revealed from price to hardware. The NGP became known as the Playstation Vita and from its time known as the NGP, it already had a blockbuster lineup in its hand, Call of Duty, Killzone, Uncharted and yes, Badman.
Also at E3, the Wii U was announced, and upon announcement, Nintendo lost a lot of shares. The Playstation Vita was then shown to replicate what the Wii U could do and on a modern generation console, no need to switch to the future. It can do what the Wii U controller can do, but more, such as a back touchpad and co-op.
To show their advantage over the Nintendo 3DS and the Wii U, the Playstation Vita and the Playstation 3 showed off something they else they could do that Nintendo's products couldn't do: get good games and work together.
The 3DS' sales then bombed, Nintendo cut its price by $ 100. Nintendo then lost a lot of money and shares.
That my friends is the story of the Playstation Vita.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)